(Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1944, portrait by Leon A. Perskie)
A couple decades ago, I was a widower learning how to date
again, and I met a younger woman who seemed to share my leftist views on life.
It made for a great, fun relationship for a while. Then I began to notice
serious cracks in what I had thought were some solid political
agreements—perhaps more a question of priorities than fundamental beliefs.
“You know what?” I told her. “The problem here is I’m a New
Deal liberal, and you’re a New Age liberal.”
We broke up long ago, but I’m sure she, like me, rages
against Donald Trump, and I’m just as sure she strongly supported Hillary
Clinton in the last election. You, Labor
South readers, know where I stand on that, banner-waving Bernie Sanders
supporter that I was.
Our divide was very similar to the divide within the
Democratic Party today. Some party
faithful may not realize it, particularly the still-powerful Clinton wing, but
it wasn’t only unions that received a horrible body blow with the U.S. Supreme
Court’s recent 5-4 Janus decision.
That decision effectively means public employees no longer have to pay union
dues even if a union is fighting for them, their wages, their working
conditions, their health care, their pensions.
In other words, the Supreme Court declared an open shop on
all unionized public employee workplaces. As a result, lawsuits are already
being filed by union members seeking refunds for the union dues they’ve paid in a
past.
So why should the Democratic Party be worried? For many
decades now, organized labor has been the most stalwart supporter—financial and
otherwise—of the Democratic Party. After all, Franklin D. Roosevelt, the most
pro-union president in the history of the United States, was a Democrat, and
most Republicans, with the rare exception, despise unions as much as their
corporate CEO friends do.
If the Democratic Party wants to take back Congress, state
legislatures, and governors’ mansions across the land, it’s going to need money
to do it, and this latest court decision will have the affect of partially drying
up a very important reservoir of cash.
This comes at a time when young people and working folks of
all stripes are crying out for a Democratic Party that responds to their needs.
The Clinton-led Democratic Party loved to knock on labor’s doors with both
hands out during election campaigns. After the campaign, however, it paid scant
attention to its financial benefactor, turning instead to the big cash
corporations that typically put Republicans in power but will support Democrats
if they’re friendly to their bottom line interests.
Here in Mississippi, voters overwhelmingly chose U.S. Senate
candidate David Baria in last week’s Democratic primary over challenger
Howard Sherman, a venture capitalist and former Republican and campaign contributor to sitting U.S.
Sen. Roger Wicker, a Mississippi Republican. Baria, who will now face Wicker in
the November election, is an unapologetic supporter of public education,
Obamacare, higher taxes on corporations and the wealthy. As a trial lawyer—what
Republicans consider to be devils—he has gone to bat for workers who’ve been
injured or discriminated against in the workplace.
And he won despite his opponent’s overwhelming financial
advantage—Sherman had a $850,000 campaign chest compared to Baria’s
$300,000--an issue Baria will face again in the November election. Even without
real opposition in his own party, Wicker has spent $3.2 million and still has
$3.4 million to spend.
With the retirement of U.S. Sen. Thad Cochran, R-Miss.,
Mississippi will have both of its U.S. Senate seats open in the November
election. On the Democratic side, former congressman and Agriculture Secretary
Mike Espy is trying a political comeback for that seat.
Espy’s out of the Clinton School, however, and folks may
still remember his pregnant silence as a congressman during the historic
catfish workers strike in his district back in 1990. The catfish workers won
that strike, and some of their leaders still wonder whether Espy was with them
or the company that fought the strike. Some folks argue he worked behind the
scenes for the strikers. “Hmmmm,” say others. Folks will be listening closely
to what he has to stay on the campaign trail this year.
Maybe we can take some encouragement by looking south of the
border. Mexico has elected as its president López Obrador, a man of the Left,
the first real leftist to lead that nation since Lázaro Cárdenas in the late 1930s. Maybe
Obrador will revitalize the ideals of the Mexican Revolution and be a true
champion of the people. Donald Trump’s not going to like it, though.
I think people on both sides of the border are looking for
politicians who’ll champion their cause, not that of the special interests.
It’s a steep uphill fight for those kinds of politicians, but I like some of
the signs I’m seeing.
No comments:
Post a Comment