(A pro-union rally at the Nissan plant in Canton, Miss., last June)
OXFORD, Miss. – I remember my late father, a tool and die
maker, telling me with pride how the company he worked for in central North
Carolina paid fair wages, offered good benefits, and treated workers with
respect. “They do that to keep the union out,” he said.
As I got older and more jaded about business practices in
America, I wondered, “How would Dad’s company have treated its workers if it
didn’t have to worry about a union?”
Chip Wells knows the answer: Even the unofficial presence of
a union and its supporters help workers long before an election is held and can
force a company to act right. Without that presence, companies are free to act
badly.
You may recall stories in this blog about Wells, the 44-year-old, 12-year
worker at the Nissan plant in Canton, Miss., father of two, and veteran with tours
in Iraq and Afghanistan. He’s also veteran of a 15-month battle with Nissan
because he supports a vote to determine whether his fellow workers can join the
United Auto Workers.
(The mile-long Nissan plant in Canton, Miss.)
That battle hopefully ended this month with Nissan officials
agreeing to approximately $6,500 in disability and back pay for Wells, whose
pro-union views were met with such hostility by managers that he had to take
unpaid medical leave. The National Labor
Relations Board ruled that Nissan’s treatment of Wells constituted unfair labor
practices. Still, the board did not require the company to provide compensation.
Nissan’s agreement this month to compensation payments “was
the minimum they could have done,” Wells said. “I’m disappointed or mad or
whatever that I had to fight just to get what I was entitled to.”
However, he said, he is satisfied with the decision. “When
they saw the pastors were not going to leave me hanging … and they started
getting questions from me and the outside, (Nissan) said … `We better go ahead and
settle up.’”
The “pastors” are members of the Mississippi Alliance for
Fairness at Nissan (MAFFAN), a key organization in the years-long grassroots
effort to get Nissan to agree to an intimidation-free union election and to
address concerns about working conditions such as a years-long drought in pay
raises, arbitrary decisions on work shifts and hours, the hiring of temporary
workers, workplace safety, and other issues.
MAFFAN embraced Wells’ case as a prime example of what can
happen when workers have no voice inside a plant that ironically was financed
in part through hundreds of millions of Mississippi taxpayer dollars.
Nissan “evidently know(s) they have been participating in
some practices that violate his rights as a citizen and worker,” said the Rev.
Melvin Chapman, a MAFFAN member and pastor of the Sand Hill Baptist Church in
Edwards, Miss.
Here’s Nissan spokesman Justin P. Saia’s e-mailed response
to the Wells case: “Nissan has a well-known process for employees to file for
short-term disability, as well as a robust process for evaluating and resolving
employment issues. … Nissan and the employee were able to reach a satisfactory
outcome.” He declined further comment due to “privacy concerns.”
Wells isn’t the only employee at Nissan’s Canton plant whose
pro-union views have gotten him into trouble. Calvin Moore, an 11-year veteran
who worked in the body shop, was terminated in March 2014 for what the UAW
publication Our Voices called
“trumped up” and non-specific charges that really were a cover for management’s
anger at Moore’s outspoken support of a union. After a campaign that included
international support from as far away as Brazil and a Jackson, Miss.-area
student protest, Moore was re-instated with two months back pay.
Just this week, Nissan turned down an offer by the U.S.
State Department to serve as a mediator in the dispute between the company and
the United Auto Workers over anti-union activity at the plant. Joining the UAW
in the request for federal assistance was the IndustriALL Global Union
Federation.
Nevertheless, the hovering presence of the UAW office on Nissan
Parkway and the growing grassroots movement around it may have been factors in several recent actions by the giant automaker. Workers finally got a pay raise
after the UAW complained that many workers had gone nearly seven years without
one.
Following the UAW and MAFFAN’s longstanding complaints about
the company’s growing dependency on temporary workers who receive less pay with
few or no benefits, the company announced a new shortened timetable for
temporary workers to be eligible for fulltime, permanent status.
The UAW and MAFFAN’s rallying cry that “Labor Rights Are
Civil Rights” could also have been echoing in Nissan officials’ ears when the
company announced a $500,000 education grant to predominantly black Canton and
$100,000 gift to the Medgar and Myrlie Evers Institute.
“Ultimately, the choice on who represents employees is
theirs and theirs alone,” Nissan spokesman Saia said. “Nissan respects the
right of our employees to decide who should represent them.”
People like the Rev. Melvin Chapman are going to keep
reminding Nissan of such claims. “We intend to keep voicing the necessary need
to do the right thing. We certainly hope it is having an impact.”
A version of this column ran recently in the Jackson Free Press of Jackson, Miss.
A version of this column ran recently in the Jackson Free Press of Jackson, Miss.
No comments:
Post a Comment