(Han Dongfang at the Washington, D.C., panel)
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A democratic election by workers at a
factory in Guangzhou to select trade union leaders and a promise by the Chinese
government to provide better vocation training for migrant workers bring a new
perspective to recent comments by Hong Kong-based labor activist Han Dongfang at
a panel discussion here. Labor South
covered the event.
Han, founder and executive director of the China Labour Bulletin in Hong Kong, said
at the one-day “Chinese Labor Movement: Which Way Forward?” panel discussion
sponsored by the Albert Shanker Institute that Chinese workers are increasingly
asserting their rights and that the Chinese government is responding. He called
on workers and activists to push for a “peaceful transfer” that could
eventually transform China’s Communist Party into a social democratic party that recognizes and protects worker rights.
“Chinese workers are fighting back,” Han said. “They are no
longer the victim. They don’t need sympathy. That makes you feel weak. … If you
are afraid of the dark, and the dark knows this, it will be aggressive.”
Han served on the June panel with Human Rights in China
Executive Director Sharon Hom and columnist and The American Prospect editor Harold Meyerson.
A correspondent with Radio Free Asia and arguably the most
prominent activist for labor rights in China, Han served 22 months in a Chinese
prison for his role in founding the Beijing Autonomous Workers Federation at
the time of the crackdown at Tiananmen Square in Beijing in 1989. After
contracting tuberlosis in prison, he was released and spent a year in treatment
in the United States. He lost most of a lung as a result and was banned from
returning to China and expelled to Hong Kong.
Despite his imprisonment by the Chinese government, Han sees
potential for significant change and the promise for more worker freedom in the
country. “I’m very politically incorrect,” he said. “I leave the door open for
the Communist Party to walk out of its past.”
A “peaceful transfer” would mean that workers “pay less in
human life and blood.”
Han pointed to several recent campaigns in China that have proven workers' growing clout. These include a strike by
40,000 workers at Yue Yuen Industrial, global supplier of Adidas, Nike and
other shoe brands, in April as well as protests and strikes by workers at the
Chinese operations of WalMart, IBM and Pepsi. “Walmart had to bow its head and
recognize the union,” Han said.
In Guangzhou in southern China last month workers at the
Japanese-owned Sumida electronics factory participated in a groundbreaking
democratic election to select union leaders, an important first step toward a true grassroots union. Furthermore, officials at a
government State Council executive meeting promised better vocation training
and other improved conditions for the nation’s 270 million rural migrants who
moved to urban areas to find work.
Han pointed to subtle changes in the language used by the
Communist Party at its congresses in recent years that have opened the way to a
“collective wage negotiation system.” The government is striving for legitimacy
with workers, Han said. The government-sanctioned All China Federation of Trade
Unions (ACFTU), which essentially operates like a company union, “does not know how to collective bargain,” Han said, but it could
learn if it became independent from “management control.”
The brightest promise on the horizon is the workers
themselves, he said. “Younger workers don’t remember Tiananmen Square or Mao, and
they don’t have the fear. … I do think the term democracy can be a part of the
future of the Communist Party.”
The others on the panel offered a more cautious view.
“It’s important to put labor rights within the context of
human rights,” Sharon Hom said. “Fear doesn’t work any more. The unions are the
core in protecting the workers.” Still, she said, “there are major
disincentives to give up power. … The corruption is so widespread.”
In a later article for Talking
Union, Meyerson said the Communist Party won’t relinquish power easily.
“The truism remains true: Power seldom yields without a struggle,” Meyerson
wrote, “If the transformation Han seeks ever arrives, it likely will be more
wrenching and bloody than the gradualist one he sketched.”
In an interview with Labor
South at his Hong Kong office in June 2013, China Labour Bulletin Communications Director Geoffrey Crothall
said the Chinese government certainly wants foreign investment and the nation’s
economy to continue to grow. At the same time, however, “the government
realizes the workers’ demands are perfectly legitimate.”
(To the right, Geoffrey Crothall in the Hong Kong offices of China Labour Bulletin)
Labor South asked both Han and Crothall whether workers’ victories for better wages and conditions in China could eventually lead to a major exodus of foreign-owned companies there. Both said that the huge industrial infrastructure already in place in China, the growing domestic market there, and simple size of the workforce make this unlikely.
Labor South asked both Han and Crothall whether workers’ victories for better wages and conditions in China could eventually lead to a major exodus of foreign-owned companies there. Both said that the huge industrial infrastructure already in place in China, the growing domestic market there, and simple size of the workforce make this unlikely.
(To the right, Han Dongfang and Labor South writer/editor Joe Atkins)
“A lot of these businesses discover that as soon as you try
to relocate to Bangladesh or Cambodia on the basis of cheap labor, that labor
is not going to stay cheap very long,” Crothall said.
Ultimately, Crothall said, “if wages in China are going up,
that is good for workers in America, good for workers in Europe. That levels
the playing field. It also means workers in China are much are more able and
likely to buy products made in the United States.”
And back here in the
U.S. South, a judge orders Kellogg to bring back Memphis workers
A U.S. District judge this week issued an order to the
Kellogg Co. to allow more than 200 workers at its Memphis plant to go back to
work and to negotiate contract issues with the Bakery, Confectionary, Tobacco
Workers and Grain Millers union.
The order from U.S. District Judge Samuel “Hardy” Mays came
after a formal complaint from the National Labor Relations Board that the
Battle Creek, Mich.-based cereal giant was in serious violation of federal
labor law when it locked out 226 Memphis workers last October because of a
union contract dispute.
The union opposed company plans to cut wages and benefits as
well as hire new “casual” workers at lower pay. The locked-out workers have
picketed outside the plant through snow and rain and summer heat since last
October.
In another development, union workers in Memphis have filed
a claim of racial discrimination in the lockout with the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission in Memphis. The locked-out workers are predominantly
African American.
The workers’ picketing won widespread support from the local
community and as far away as the Congressional Black Caucus in Washington, D.C.
And an upcoming
tribute to jazz great Charlie Haden …
Expect soon a Labor
South tribute to jazz great Charlie Haden, who died at 76 last month. The
bassist, one of this writer's favorite musicians, helped change jazz forever when he and the rest of the Ornette
Coleman’s quartet recorded The Shape of
Jazz to Come in 1959. Haden was also revolutionary in his politics and once
was thrown in a Portuguese jail for his provocative music, leftist politics,
and support of liberation movements in Angola and Mozambique.
No comments:
Post a Comment